<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Forest Poetry &#187; Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forestpoetry.com/tag/technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forestpoetry.com</link>
	<description>Traditional Ethics &#38; Metaphysics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 03:48:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Irrelevancy of the Historical Jesus</title>
		<link>http://www.forestpoetry.com/2010/the-irrelevancy-of-the-historical-jesus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forestpoetry.com/2010/the-irrelevancy-of-the-historical-jesus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modernity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forestpoetry.com/?p=626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is currently common among biblical scholars to study the "historical Jesus".¹'² This interest is paralleled, and to a small extent influential on general interest in the topic among the public. In Christians, some of this takes the form of interest in details of Jesus' "personality", or even his physical appearance, as religious accessories.³]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forestpoetry.com/2010/the-irrelevancy-of-the-historical-jesus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Destiny</title>
		<link>http://www.forestpoetry.com/2010/destiny/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forestpoetry.com/2010/destiny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forestpoetry.com/?p=517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists have foretold that after five billion years, the Earth will be absorbed into the sun as the sun reaches the end of its lifespan. What they have described, by way of analogy, is in fact the absorption of the entire cosmos into the principial substance.  ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forestpoetry.com/2010/destiny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What We Stand to Win: Sacrificing Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.forestpoetry.com/2009/what-we-stand-to-win-sacrificing-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forestpoetry.com/2009/what-we-stand-to-win-sacrificing-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forestpoetry.com/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As explained in our article <a href="http://www.forestpoetry.com/articles/the-problem-of-technology/">"The Problem of Technology"</a>, humanity has lost many things through its obsession with mechanistic advancement. Here are some things we stand to win by using technology in a responsible manner, or not using it at all.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forestpoetry.com/2009/what-we-stand-to-win-sacrificing-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

