Forest Poetry

06/29/10

Knowledge

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , — admin @ 9:33 pm

Knowledge does not come to us in details,

but in flashes of light from heaven.

-Henry David Thoreau.*

Knowledge is generally defined, at last nowadays, as facts integrated by the mental faculty. True knowledge is in fact a total integration of Truth into the whole being, so it is not only the mental faculty but every other human faculty that must participate in the act of knowing. It is for this reason that we say ‘to know is to be’, for in the final analysis what we know is what we are.

knowledge

Now most men would claim that they do not in fact know all that they are, for example that they do not have perfect knowledge of the physical body. What they mean by this is actually that this knowledge is not grasped by the mental faculty, precisely because it exists on a more contingent plane than reason. If then, extent of the mental faculty is what most men call knowledge, how much greater must be the Knowledge of the Absolute Reality, given that it is all encompassing. This is why we say that God alone possesses pure Knowledge. The knowledge of man is limited and fragile, but the Knowledge of God is unlimited precisely because He is unlimited.

The knowledge of man, insofar as he is limited to reason, is a distant reflection of divine Knowledge. Reason is capable of grasping facts only because it is illuminated by pure Intelligence. Reason is like the moon, the intellect like the sun. Now when a man has harmony within himself, reason is like a pure mirror, light can illuminate and cause it to reflect. On the other hand, when a man is wisespiritually unstable, the rational faculty is like a crude mirror which distorts those things which it reflects. In this case the rational faculty may still be able to grasp facts, but it will distort them and twist them towards false ends. This is the case with the rationalists of our day. Both of the previous scenarios assume that man does not have direct access to the divine Intellect itself, which is not necessarily the case. When it occurs that a man actively realizes his non-separation from God, his knowledge is no longer his own, but that of God. In this case rational intelligence can contribute nothing to what that man knows, but then serves the function of formulating that knowledge to display it to the world. For man, the realization that he is not other than God shatters the illusion of the ego, which at this point is seen never to have existed, this is why it is said that “an undelivered man is actually a delivered man who does not know it”.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

*The Thoreau Reader. Annotated works of Henry David Thoreau. Life Without Principle: http://thoreau.eserver.org/life2.html

05/17/10

Steps to the Spiritual Realization

Filed under: English — Tags: , , — admin @ 10:31 am

“In the ancient days, when the first quiver of speech came to my lips, I ascended the holy mountain and spoke unto God, saying, ‘Master, I am thy slave. Thy hidden will is my law and I shall obey thee for ever more.’But God made no answer, and like a mighty tempest passed away.And after a thousand years I ascended the holy mountain and again spoke unto God, saying, ‘Creator, I am thy creation. Out of clay hast thou fashioned me and to thee I owe mine all.’

And God made no answer, but like a thousand swift wings passed away.

And after a thousand years I climbed the holy mountain and spoke unto God again, saying, ‘Father, I am thy son. In pity and love thou hast given me birth, and through love and worship I shall inherit thy kingdom.’

And God made no answer, and like the mist that veils the distant hills he passed away.

And after a thousand years I climbed the sacred mountain and again spoke unto God, saying, ‘My God, my aim and my fulfillment; I am thy yesterday and thou art my tomorrow. I am thy root in the earth and thou art my flower in the sky, and together we grow before the face of the sun.’

Then God leaned over me, and in my ears whispered words of sweetness, and even as the sea that enfoldeth a brook that runneth down to her, he enfolded me.

And when I descended to the valleys and the plains God was there also.

-“God” by Khalil Gibran

Man, as a slave, is tied to his master and his laws. Man surrenders because he fears the punishment of his disobedience; because he has tasted solitude and error, and by following orders he will commit no mistake and he will not be alone. He lowers his head, and begs for a master to grant him no hell. This is called in Catholicism “Attrition” or “Imperfect Contrition” where the sinner repents for fear of the sanction, and not for love of God. The Trent Council in Canon v, Sess. XIV declares: “If any man assert that attrition . . . is not a true and a profitable sorrow; that it does not prepare the soul for grace, but that it makes a man a hypocrite, yea, even a greater sinner, let him be anathema”¹ In this state, life is an unavoidable burden which subjugates man and leaves no place for piety.

What follows is man as a creature, whose life is a gift, a grace, the divine breath infused in all living flesh. Yet man cannot recognize his own soul, confusing it with life, with some inkling of joy as a creature, as an animal, but not in the glory of his recognition as the imago dei, the image of God, and therefore grace is not fully received. In the Platonic school of thought, there is an idea called Scala Naturae, or “Great chain of being”, where man is imbued with the Logos. He’s beyond a creature, an animal, plant or stone. Although in this state, just as a creation, he can’t recognize this and so he understands himself only as his lower self allows him to. path

And next man, as a son, sees himself as a lesser, mortal god, who deserves a place in Heaven through devotion and love. But the duality remains. The son knows about his Father, yet, he still is divided from Him, wrapped in the veil of maya, wailing in this valley of tears, expecting the kingdom of no suffering to come to the Earth. But, is He actually apart from man, waiting for an event to have an actual existence in the heart of His son? The sufi poet Ibn ‘Arabi said about this:

“You presume others to be other than Allah. There is nothing

other than He, but you do not know this. While you are

looking at Him you do not recognize Him. When the secret

opens to you, you will know that you are none other than He”

Man, as one with God, finally reaches Wahdat al-Wajud, or Unity of Being. Man becomes just a manifestation of God, not an entity that is separated by a intermediary reality. As was exposed by Meister Eckhart in his fourth sermon: “The eye with which I see God is the same with which God sees me. My eye and God’s eye is one eye, and one sight, and one knowledge, and one love.” This is the highest realization of man, and even when man goes through the world, the certainty of Oneness acompanies him wherever he goes.

———————————————————————————————————————————

¹New Advent: Catholic Encyclopedia . http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02065a.htm

04/21/10

The Irrelevancy of the Historical Jesus

Filed under: English — Tags: , , , — admin @ 1:43 pm

"The Real Face of Jesus"-Popular MechanicsIt is currently common for biblical scholars to study the “historical Jesus”.1,2 This interest is paralleled, and to a small extent influential on general interest in the topic among the public. In Christians, some of this takes the form of interest in details of Jesus’ “personality”, or even his physical appearance, as religious accessories.3,4,5

“Souls which have come to a unitive knowledge of God, are, to use Benet Canfield’s phrase, “almost nothing in themselves and all in God.” This vanishing residue of selfness persists because, in some slight measure, they still identify their being with some innate psycho-physical idiosyncrasy, some acquired habit of thought or feeling, some contention or analyzed prejudice current in the social environment. Jesus was almost wholly absorbed in the essential will of God; but in spite of this , he may have retained some elements of selfness. To what extent there was any “I” associated with the more-than-personal, divine “Not-I,” it is very difficult, on the basis of the existing evidence, to judge.

[...]

The moral of all this is plain. The quantity and quality of the surviving biographical documents are such that we have no means of knowing what the residual personality of Jesus was really like. But if the Gospels tells us very little about the “I” which was Jesus, they make up for this deficiency by telling us inferentially, in the parables and discourses, a good deal about the spiritual “not-I,” whose manifest presence in the mortal man was the reason why his disciple called him the Christ and identified him with the eternal Logos.”

-Aldous Huxley, The Perrenial Philosophy, p.48-49

defacedThis focus on what Huxley calls the “selfness” or “I” of Jesus is irrelevant to the purpose of religion. That is, if the goal of metaphysical study is to know what is True (and what is true is eternal, immanent, and therefore a-historical), then a focus on the historical Jesus cannot aid our understanding of God, and in the worst cases can fetishize the individualistic aspects of humanity that the prophet condemns.

But Christians are not the only group which engages in this obsession with corporeal reality. Ironically, atheists also often cite historical studies, but to disprove the occurrence of events described in scripture, in order to to discredit religion in general. The result is often unintentionally comedic:

“Disproving the Bible in Under One Minute”

Both these parties miss the point. Whatever the historical facts of a religious event or person, its significance lies far above and before such a limited historical view. Rather, its significance lies in what is a-historical to it. We should always have an eye to what is supra-situational. Whatsoever emerges as consistent, through the transitory effects of historical frames, is the Ground, and to engage in historical speculation on spiritual topics is like trying to stand by jumping.

Jump Rope

—————————————————————————————————————————–

¹Meier, John P. A Marginal Jew Rethinking the Historical Jesus. New Haven, CT: Yale UP, 2009.

²Sanders, E. P. Jesus and Judaism. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1985.

³ http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/real-face-jesus-christ/story?id=10235129

4http://users.skynet.be/sky50779/jesus.htm

5Day, Elizabeth. “Jesus Might Have Been Homosexual, Says the First Openly Gay Bishop – Telegraph.” Telegraph.co.uk. 3 Apr. 2005. Web. <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1487002/Jesus-might-have-been-homosexual-says-the-first-openly-gay-bishop.html>.

04/4/10

The Time of Easter

Filed under: English — Tags: , , — admin @ 11:57 am

Moderns excitedly point out that the holidays marking the birth and resurrection of Christ peepsoccur at times of the year that are of spiritual and ritual significance to many other traditions, particularly those that predate Christianity. Apparently it follows from this that if pre-Christian Europe held festivals during the winter solstice and the advent of spring, then Christian holidays are held at those times because of older traditions, not because they reflect the true timeline of the savior’s life.¹’² This in turn suggests that the origins of Christianity are mundane rather than divine.

But this is circular reasoning, because it makes a big assumption at the outset: that Christ is not the son of God. If Christ is the son of God, then it would make the most sense that his birth and resurrection did occur at spiritually and metaphysically significant times of the year. If anything, the fact that these times of the year are significant to other traditions is an argument in favor of the divine origin of Christianity. All truth is God’s truth, and all authentic traditions have their origins in Him. When a tradition has grown decadent and is replaced by a healthier tradition with stronger divine contact, syncretism occurs because there are symbols in both traditions that have the same metaphysical orientation. The incarnation and the winter solstice point to the same metaphysical truths, as do the resurrection and the advent of spring.

sapling

Also of importance is the consideration that Easter does not fall on the same date each year. This could imply that even if the resurrection did occur in the spring, by only celebrating it on a Sunday, Easter would likely not fall on exactly the same day as the event itself. This overlooks the fact that the date of the resurrection has double significance, in both the time of the year and the time of the week in which it took place. The divisions of both the year and the week have spiritual significance. The resurrection occurred during the spring, the time when the natural world enjoys new life, and also occurred on the sabbath, obviously the holiest day of the week for the Christian tradition. Celebrating it on a sunday at around the same time of year best captures and preserves this double significance.

The material world is one of time and change, change that often appears to us to be chaotic. But at a higher level, all material existence and change is bound by divinely ordained cycles. These cycles are many and are of varying degree, from a single day to the life of a man or the life of the cosmos. Within the cycles there are natural points of demarcation and division. That God’s manifestation on earth coincided with these points should not cause any difficulty.

———————————————————————————————————————

¹McDougall, Heather. “The Pagan Roots of Easter.” TheGuardian.uk. 3 Apr. 2010. Web. 04 Apr. 2010. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2010/apr/03/easter-pagan-symbolism>.

²Carlson, Royce. “The Pagan Origins of Easter.” Zenzibar.com. 1 Apr. 2001. Web. 4 Apr. 2010. <http://www.zenzibar.com/articles/easter.asp)>.

03/31/10

The Necessity of Miracles

Filed under: English — Tags: , — admin @ 10:02 pm

CaveA miracle occurs when the supernatural order directly intervenes in the natural order. Through a modern abuse of language, the latter term has come to connote rationality, and the former irrationality.  However, there is nothing irrational in the nature of a miracle.  It is logical that the possibility of direct contact between the natural and supernatural orders must be realized, given that they are only separate in appearance. If the natural order was truly divorced from the supernatural, and therefore there was no possibility of a miracle, then it would have no existence whatsoever, because it would have no principle or root. If the inverse is true, then miracles are a necessity by the very fact that they are possible. The bolt of lightning, with its suddenness and blinding whiteness reflects the principle of the miracle in the natural order proper.

03/2/10

Truth in Traditionalism Pt.2

Filed under: English — Tags: , — admin @ 3:03 pm

Perrenialism is sometimes attacked or ignored because its teachings are viewed as an “appeal to tradition”, a type of logical fallacy. This is a dangerous misunderstanding.

Ideas are neither confirmed nor disproven through their inclusion in a historical account. Such a belief constitutes a “historicist” viewpoint, (one against which traditionalist authors have argued¹) that is in opposition to formal logic. If traditionalists were to participate in this historicist fallacy as it is claimed we do² , then we would be forced to accept a whole record of historically confirmed ideas and behaviors which we, in fact, actively condemn. Need we be reminded of the pornography common to ancient Roman, Greek, and Indian civilizations?

Traditionalism therefore does not claim authority on the basis of historical corroboration with its directives. So from whence does it derive authority?

The answer lies in that the upholding of tradition is, counter-intuitively, an a-historical task. We see this idea’s explication most succinctly in this passage by Hegel, quoted in Evola’s Men Among the Ruins:

“It is a matter of recognizing in the apparitions of temporal and transitory things, both the substance, which is immanent, and the eternal, which is actual.”³

Furthermore, that which is eternal is necessarily actual. Elsewise, it would be subject to change, and could not be called eternal. Following from this, we could correctly conclude that if the eternal is not conditioned by the passage of time, then it may indeed be possible to find examples of the eternal in our own era. This is very different from the picture usually painted of traditionalists as overly-mystical history buffs.

So while it may seem that here we focus on ancient history, let us be reminded of the traditions associated with Native Americans, Monastic Orders, and other small communities that exist in the present. The Golden Age can exist at any point in time, and it is precisely because that it is Golden that it transcends time in this way.

Rock

—————————————————————————————————————————————————

¹Cutsinger, James S. “An Open Letter On Tradition.” Modern Age 36.3 (1994). Cutsinger.net. Web. <http://www.cutsinger.net/pdf/open_letter_on_tradition.pdf>.

²Dawkins, Richard. A Devil’s Chaplain: Selected Essays. London: Phoenix, 2004. Open Parachute. Web. <http://openparachute.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/prayer-for-my-daughter.pdf>.

³Evola, Julius. Men among the Ruins: Postwar Reflections of a Radical Traditionalist. Rochester, Vt.: Inner Traditions, 2002. Print. , p. 116

^Passage originally appeared in the author’s introduction to Philosophy of Right.

02/20/10

Truth in Traditionalism

Filed under: English — Tags: , , , — admin @ 6:08 pm

Some people reading traditionalist writers get finicky when they first see Truth with a capital T, because they doubt that any ultimate Truth can be attainable, or even worse, they fear a monopolization of opinion in the intention of establishing an “intolerant” version of Truth in society; both are typical misunderstandings of an individualistic modern era. We will explain what we refer to as Truth in Traditionalism.

From a metaphysical perspective, the whole of existence is present because of its participation in Reality, the Absolute. This is what Aristotle, Avicenna and St. Aquinas called in some way or other the First Cause, an uncaused cause, that which is by itself, but also causes the entire creation and its elements. Therefore, forms that emerge from that origin have specific characteristics that adjoin with the rest of the characteristics of other forms, under a series of natural laws. All forms partake of a single reality and irremediably act according to Nature.

sun_ray

The quest of natural sciences is to understand the physical laws that govern matter and to elaborate theories to explain their functioning. However, it is outside of its capacities to determine that what would be outside action and reaction , the Uncaused Cause,  as well as a source of the laws of matter, even if laws themselves are made of matter. To understand Truth, it is essential to realize that “Truth” is not an empirical “truth” that may be contained within a scientifically experimental system.

Truth in the sense used by Traditionalists relates purely to the metaphysical nature of Reality, of God.  The revelations which found religions are crystallisations of this Truth within the contingent sphere of forms.  Once the metaphysical experience has occurred for the individual, to call it Truth is a logical consequence of a comprehension of a state preceding phenomena, from whence the multiplicity of forms is derived. “The Way produces one. One produces two. Two produces three. Three produces everything.” Tao Te Ching, 42.

In a strict sense, Truth is the saving manifestation of the Absolute, and according to Schuon, it differs from the concept of reality: “Truth and reality must not be confused: the latter relates to “being” and signifies the aseity of things, and the former relates to “knowing” – to the image of reality reflected in the mirror of the intellect “. Truth is the certainty of the Absolute. Also, as a term the word Truth provokes inquisitiveness, giving a variety of correlations in regards to specific aspects of spiritual pursuit.

An example is Truth serving as an opposition to what’s false or unreal in our perception: this is, in Sanskrit, maya. It is not that maya forms a reality apart from Truth, but only that it is an illusion that occurs within the Absolute, in which we see our ego and its material circumstances as the ultimate reality of consciousness. This ignorance of Truth, or avidya, makes us believe that the entire creation is separated and dispersed, through circumstantial dualities of attachment and aversion, and so the discovery of Truth requires man to pierce the veil of maya, surpassing ignorance. Again, this ignorance is not of an empirical nature, but it is a supposition that the thirst for our mundane ends (trsna) is the only possibility and therefore the highest motivation of man.

Truth has social implications as a social reality, even when both objects are different. Social reality is built around the pursuit of Truth, and finds its manifestation in the cultural sphere, bringing a mutually shared aim that pushes individuals towards a transcendent spirit. This, of course, does not escape from the organic life of societies. The rise of the greatest cultures in History has been conditioned by such sight, and their downfall has been marked by the pluralisation of smaller and individualistic convictions. The degeneration of civilizations shows a correspondent dysfunction in all strata of society, a neglect of Truth for the emergence of self-interests, causing class conflict. In this downfall, it is possible that an imposition of ideology may claim “Truth”, acting in an overly-coercive way foreign to aristocracy, and closer to tyranny. So, this “truth” is a social construction and an imposition very far from Truth.

Now, how can we know the constitution of this Truth, beyond its social functionality? Through Revelation.

william_blake_jacobs_ladder

We will cite Schuon again: “Revelation is none other than the objective and symbolic manifestation of the Light which man carries in himself, in the depths of his being”. Symbolic, Revelation carries a set of signs, and behaviour codes for the communities which essentially are connivance rules that even humanists can appreciate, and of which violation constitutes the disgrace of every culture. This aspect serves an exoteric purpose. The symbols are dependent on the history of cultures, but if they emerge from the Absolute, they have an objective end. Being Absolute and objective, God can’t be reduced as a social phenomena, even when there exists a social organization around the idea of a God. The key here is to understand the symbols in order to achieve the knowing of the Truth, attainable through the methods of prayer, which constitute a quest for the individual in his last stance.

Satya, a Sanskrit term for Truth, is understood in Hinduism as the everlasting reality independent to time and events. This means that Truth is immanent in the discoveries of a growing and positive science that occurs in human history, and also the rise and eventual death of human societies. Truth brings conditions for human reorganization across history, over a human and relative conception, and the man that ventures in the methods of Religion, not only through empirical science, finds himself in certainty of such Truth, transcending his human circumstances.

11/24/09

New Article: The Virtue of Prayer

Filed under: English — Tags: , , , , , — admin @ 12:05 am

This method of spiritual recognition has two inescapable and mutually inclusive sides: on one hand ethics as a guide for behavior for the external, material world, and on the other hand a contemplative exercise for inward, spiritual experience. In order to know the Divine, beyond all the acknowledged metaphysical theory, both these interdependent and indivisible aspects must be present within a given religion.¹

What exactly is this contemplative praxis? Very simple: Prayer.

Read the full article here.

09/12/09

New Article: Monotheism

Filed under: English — Tags: , , — admin @ 10:21 pm

“A monotheistic religion is one which revolves around a single God. Usually monotheism refers specifically to religions of Semitic origin (Judaism, Christianity and Islam). The word itself, however, directly implies that which is essential to all religions and metaphysical doctrines, the Absolute

[...]

Monotheism makes two basic demands of all men, firstly faith in God, and secondly an actualization of this faith in every aspect of life. These two demands are outlined by Jesus Matthew 22:34-40, and form the fundamental principles of spiritual life within the sphere of all the major religions, monotheistic or not.”

Read the full article here: Monotheism

08/20/09

An Exhortation

Filed under: English — Tags: , , , — admin @ 9:15 pm

In countless myths from all traditional cultures of the world, strong, fair heroes do battle with vile and deformed beasts. Sometimes the heroes are remarkable mortals, sometimes the gods themselves, the villains also varying in power. These tales have endured in popularity, even to the modern day, although their true meaning is no longer widely understood. It is often assumed that these tales serve to show the triumph of good over evil and to serve as an inspiration to act in a similar manner. While this is an accurate interpretation, it is not the most profound level of understanding, and one must not neglect the metaphysical significance, the meaning of the tales that can be applied to internal spiritual realization.

The characters in these myths represent the eternal metaphysical principles that govern the world and the life of man. The “battle” that takes places represents the struggle in manifested things that exist suspended between the beauty and order of the divine and the shadow existence of matter. These things can either hold fast to the divine and thereby stabilize their existence (that is, the heroes can be triumphant), or they can veer towards matter and dissolution (that is, the villains can be triumphant). The Greek philosopher Proclus describes it thus, referencing the myth of Athena doing battle with the giants:

“The true warfare with the giants takes place in souls: whenever reason and intellect rule in them, the goods of the Olympians and Athena prevail, and the entire life is kingly and philosophical; but whenever the passions reign, or in general the worse and earth-born elements, then the constitution within them is tyranny.” ¹

Many of those who deplore modernity lament that the glorious struggles of past legends are absent from a world that has been reduced by technology and quantitative valuations, and they long for an age when a man can exert all of his energies in a struggle for the good. While such external conditions are indeed desirable, a yearning for such an external struggle must not obscure the true battle. If the true battle is in our souls, then good men must be more fervent in this battle; they must crave victory and sacrifice in this struggle just as assiduously as they would with swords in their hands. Unlike the physical battle, this inner battle does not end, at least not for any but the most advanced spiritual masters. Consider, then, how hard you would fight and strain when facing enemies on the field, and make that thought present in your mind when the worse elements within yourself begin to assert themselves.

¹Proclus. Proclus’ Commentary on Plato’s “Parmenides” Trans. Glenn R. Morrow and John M. Dillon. New York: Princeton UP, 1992. Print, 71.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress